ToomuchaT
30-12-07, 06:59 PM
That was the title of the email I've recently received.. could be an old one!!
http://chatty.jeeran.com/BR.JPG
http://chatty.jeeran.com/BR.JPG
|
View Full Version : Biggest Robbery of the 20th Century!! ToomuchaT 30-12-07, 06:59 PM That was the title of the email I've recently received.. could be an old one!! http://chatty.jeeran.com/BR.JPG MoZeS 30-12-07, 07:08 PM that is well BAD! and what about the Hajj pilgrims stuck in Egypt? what an act of shame. Riv 30-12-07, 07:09 PM yea i got this by email, its really sad Giggles 30-12-07, 11:49 PM You can blame the Arab states that attacked Israel for this. The second biggest robbery of the 20th century would be the amount of money that Arafat and his cronies stole from the "Palestinians" and those that continue to steal from the "Palestinians". ti3gib 31-12-07, 12:03 AM You can blame the Arab states that attacked Israel for this. The second biggest robbery of the 20th century would be the amount of money that Arafat and his cronies stole from the "Palestinians" and those that continue to steal from the "Palestinians". Ohh shut your mouth .. Just shut your mouth Giggles 31-12-07, 05:32 AM Ohh shut your mouth .. Just shut your mouth ouch. hit a sore nerve did i? ti3gib 31-12-07, 06:29 AM Yes the smell one. You're stinking the place by shitting all over the place. Giggles 31-12-07, 07:32 AM Yes the smell one. You're stinking the place by shitting all over the place. you've hurt my feelings. i'm going to cry. :cry: ChezChez 31-12-07, 07:50 AM you've hurt my feelings. i'm going to cry. :cry: NICE :cute: ! Jeff 31-12-07, 08:19 AM Well, I think there are myths on both sides. Though there is not doubt in my mind that an injustice was done to the Palestinians, it was a garden variety injustice, done countless times over the course of human history, not the "Biggest Robbery of the Twentieth Century". It always helps to remember that Muscat province is 3000 plus square kilometers and the whole of Mandatory Palestine (excluding Transjordan) is a bit more than 20000 square kilometers. A good hiker can walk across Palestine, from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River, in a day. Jihad4Truth 31-12-07, 11:01 AM Actually all that land belonged to the British Empire at the time. They got it from the Turkish Empire. And most of it is the Negev desert which always was and still is uninhabited desert waste land. And if the Arab powers had accepted the 1947 partition plan, then Palestine today would like picture number two and there would be no Palestinian refugees. And think about it, the various Arab Armies like Syria, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq did not attack the new state of Israel in 1948 on behalf of the Palestinians. They were trying to annex the land for themselves when the British Army left. ti3gib 31-12-07, 11:32 AM J4T, There's no reason at all the Palestinians should have accepted the 1947 partition plan, which counters their interests. Yours, Ti3 EvilFire 31-12-07, 11:36 AM Nice , is this one of the threads which mods get blind and its ok we insult each other ? *Yoopi* can I join ? Death or all filthy shitty jewish whom invading palestine lands.. I wish to skin them alive then put salt .I wish to let them bleed and feed them with Pegs blood ( their kind) then take their nails off + take one of their eyes off. Jihad4Truth 31-12-07, 12:32 PM J4T, There's no reason at all the Palestinians should have accepted the 1947 partition plan, which counters their interests. Yours, Ti3 That's just pride talking. Logic would reason otherwise. Looking back, the best thing for all people would have been the partition plan. And what the Pals demand now, after 60 years of fighting, displacement and living in squalor, is not nearly as good as the '47 plan. Storm 31-12-07, 12:49 PM You can blame the Arab states that attacked Israel for this. Let’s say the blame isn’t only to Arab :bored: Israel, UK, and US have their share of the cake ( and really a big part :rolleyes: ) Jeff 31-12-07, 05:23 PM That's just pride talking. Logic would reason otherwise. Looking back, the best thing for all people would have been the partition plan. And what the Pals demand now, after 60 years of fighting, displacement and living in squalor, is not nearly as good as the '47 plan. That's what we call "the benefit of hindsight". What to us looking backward seems stable and obvious looked then to be ramshackle and impermanent instead, as well as unjust. Why should the inhabitants of Palestine have accepted an ongoing and still not very successful attempt to settle their country with outsiders and create a new state there? Especially when the British had given up on the project and were simply throwing up their hands and leaving? No one expected the Israelis to win their war of independence in '48. It was one of the great astonishments of 20th century history. Israel as a permanent reality of history is something that we came early to and the Arabs have come late to. But they are coming round to it, out of necessity. I think ti3ib and you are both right in different ways. (If it isn't obvious, that's what I THINK.) MoZeS 31-12-07, 06:34 PM ^ Again, Archeology is not an excuse to own a land. does the state name "israel" really indicate that its people are from this descent? of course not. muslims recognise the real israeli existence but today's israel exaggerated with using Archeology as an excuse to invade. shouldnt the red indians ovethrow the white government of the united states? Looking back, the best thing for all people would have been the partition plan. Jihad for truth, can you explain how would it be the best? Jeff 31-12-07, 06:44 PM I didn't say "archaeology is an excuse to own a land." What I think is that no one "owns" lands forever. When people live there and have settled in, the land belongs to them in the only way that is meaningful. So, I think Zionism was an injustice to the Arab inhabitants. But I think that the Israelis have "settled in". And it would be an injustice to push them out. What happened two thousand years ago is irrelevant. So is what happened fifty years ago. There is Israel, which exists. There is Palestinian-inhabited territory and Palestinian refugees and a sense of Palestinian nationalism. These too exist. So, there needs to be a division of the country for the sake of peace. And there will be. Hopefully soon, but in any case, not too many years from now. Threadlike 31-12-07, 11:53 PM You want my frank opinion? I'm bored. With all this. How many years does it take humans to stop wondering who was wrong and who is wrong and end their wars? Apparently, a lot. So I'll just sit and wait. If there's anything I can do about the 'biggest robbery of the 20th century' contact me. shamsery 01-01-08, 02:13 PM Whom you want to blame? Who is responsible? Ask yourself or cry sitting in a corner of room. Threadlike 01-01-08, 07:54 PM ^Was that directed at me or to somebody else? NicoBambi 01-01-08, 08:05 PM poor Israel :( shamsery 02-01-08, 10:10 AM ^Was that directed at me or to somebody else? Salam, Referring to Muslim Ummah. |