View Full Version : U.S. to allow 7,000 Iraqi refugees


IceTea
15-02-07, 11:20 AM
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration hopes to resettle about 7,000 Iraqi refugees to the United States this year, the State Department said Wednesday.

The decision comes amid pressure from the U.S. Congress and the international community to do more about the growing refugee crisis.

U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres estimates as many as 2 million Iraqis have left their country since the war began, and another 1.7 million have moved within Iraq as a result of increased sectarian violence.

The United States, however, has taken in only 466 Iraqi refugees since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

On Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Guterres to outline a new U.S. program for Iraqi refugees, which includes $18 million for additional funding for UNHCR to assist with resettlement of refugees in other countries and humanitarian aid.

The plan is the work of a new task force announced last week to study the Iraqi refugee issue.

U.S. Undersecretary Paula Dobriansky, who led the task force, said the United States would attempt to resettle about 7,000 Iraqi refugees from countries where they have fled from Iraq.

"The United States and the international community can best help displaced Iraqis by quelling the violence in Iraq," she said. "At the same time, we have a responsibility to respond to the immediate needs of Iraqis who have fled violence and persecution."

Dobriansky said the United States is also working to develop special provisions for resettlement of thousands of Iraqis who work for the United States in Iraq and are still there, but face increased threat because of their cooperation with the coalition.

The 7,000 Iraqis would be included as part of 70,000 refugees worldwide permitted under U.S. law to resettle in the United States each year.

U.S. Assistant Secretary for Population, Refugees, and Migration Ellen Sauerbrey said that Iraqis referred to the United States from UNHCR and other countries for possible resettlement in the United States would go through rigorous security checks and health screening before being allowed to migrate.

The United States has been criticized for accepting only a small number of refugees since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Sauerbrey said that it wasn't until the February 2006 bombing of the Shiite mosque in Samarra that the sectarian violence began to reach a level that prompted large numbers of refugees to flee Iraq, and until then the need for resettlement was rather small.

The majority of Iraqi refugees have fled into Syria and Jordan.

Guterres, who attended the briefing for reporters, said that while resettling refugees is very important, providing aid to neighboring countries so that refugees living there temporarily can live dignified lives is also critical. He said Arab countries are hosting refugees because of their traditional culture of hospitality, but those countries need additional capacity to help refugees over the long term.

While he said resettlement could mean "life or death" for some Iraqis, it will never fully address the problem. He stressed a political solution is needed so that refugees will be able to go home.

Last week, Rice authorized the U.S. Embassy in Syria to talk to to the Syrian government about the flow of Iraqi refugees, but made clear it was not the start of a broader conversation on Iraq.

Dobriansky said the United States has been in contact with several countries in the region, including Syria, about the refugee situation in those nations.

When asked if the U.S. commitment is enough, Guterres said, "The dimension of the problem is so huge that nothing is anytime enough, but I think it's a very good start."

He said the United Nations will hold a donors conference in coming months to raise money to help Iraqi refugees and those internally displaced. He said Iran, which is currently hosting about 50,000 Iraqi refugees, will take part.

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/14/us.iraq.refugees/index.html

========

Iraqi people used to have homes, now they are without homes.

Would this have been happining if there was no invasion?

Will the Iraqi people end up like the Palestinain refugees?

Mr Tickle
15-02-07, 12:55 PM
Would this have happened if OBL had not attacked America?

Would this have happened if Shias and Sunnis did not exist?

IceTea
15-02-07, 01:27 PM
Think about it, invading Iraq was because of WMD or you forgot already.

amo_l_oman
15-02-07, 01:43 PM
lol yesterday when asked whether he'd use for Iran same intelligence team of Iraqi WMD, Georgia started barking

HITMAN
15-02-07, 02:03 PM
Would this have happened if OBL had not attacked America?



Pinno, you sound a bit confused

Afghanistan's war was linked to OBL

Iraq war was based on Iraq possessing WMD & hey had solid prove

Mr Tickle
15-02-07, 02:16 PM
You guys love talking about 'origins'

Well

Did OBL's attack lead to the chain of events that ended up in the Iraq war?

HITMAN
15-02-07, 02:28 PM
Did OBL's attack lead to the chain of events that ended up in the Iraq war?

No sorry, I don't see how they are linked

Mr Tickle
15-02-07, 02:38 PM
Hope you understand what I mean by 'chain of events'

PS So what you are saying is that Bush would have invaded Iraq if 9/11 never happened.......the same Bush who campaigned on a minimal foreign policy?

Looking forward to your logic

Thalia
15-02-07, 02:40 PM
No sorry, I don't see how they are linked
they are actually.

Even though I don;t agree with the whole war and obviously think the reasons were just a bunch of lies, some other reasons for attacking Iraq along with the WMD's was that Saddam allowed terrorists to be trained in IRAQ for Al Qaeda. (and the risk that WMD'swould be sold/given to Al Qaeda to use against the US. )

Giggles
15-02-07, 06:35 PM
Will the Iraqi people end up like the Palestinain refugees?


End up like the Palestinians? You mean as in being used as pawns against the JOOOOOOS. As in no one gives damn about them unless it serves their own agenda? As in being exploited by islamofascists?

Let's hope not.

Desert_Sloath
15-02-07, 07:28 PM
Hope you understand what I mean by 'chain of events'

PS So what you are saying is that Bush would have invaded Iraq if 9/11 never happened.......the same Bush who campaigned on a minimal foreign policy

Looking forward to your logic




While you are waiting for that logic here is another one logic posted earlier:-



Link:


http://209.151.72.86/forum/showthread.php?t=44822





.

wudjab
15-02-07, 09:01 PM
I have asked this question several times before and will ask it again.

How many countries had George Bush invaded before 9/11.

Therein lies the answer.

Desert_Sloath
15-02-07, 09:20 PM
I have asked this question several times before and will ask it again.

How many countries had George Bush invaded before 9/11.

Therein lies the answer.



2 answer your kuwaition you owe Sablanian an answer and that is to the kuwaition about the reason for invading IRAQ.

9/11 was attributed to bombing indiscreminately bombing Afghanistan.

I don't understanding of any sensible power that could subject, a poor society like Afghanistan that had been exhausted by the Russian's occupation, with so called carpet bombing ? The then USSR never used carpet against the Afghanis.

Well I think we're already off topic. This threat is about the 7000 Iraqis presurised to serrender to America against their wish.

Obviously they will become guine pigs for brain washing and eventually sent back to tople al-Malki's government. Correct ?




.

Mr Tickle
16-02-07, 12:50 PM
Well I think we're already off topic. This threat is about the 7000 Iraqis presurised to serrender to America against their wish.

Obviously they will become guine pigs for brain washing and eventually sent back to tople al-Malki's government. Correct ?

Is there anywhere I can download your songs?