View Full Version : Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
pharmacy113 23-08-03, 05:28 PM http://us.ent4.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/allposters/01/1808416901p.jpg
This time around, archaeologist and explorer extraordinaire
Lara Croft journeys to a temple, sunken underwater, that leads to a sphere that contains the mythical Panadora's Box, only to have it stolen from her by Chen Lo, the leader of a Chinese crime syndicate, who's in league with a bad guy named Reiss who wants to use the Box as a doomsday weapon
Genre:
Action/Adventure
Running time:
2 hrs. 10 min.
Starring:
Angelina Jolie, Gerard Butler, Chris Barrie
Directed by:
Jan De Bont
Showing this Wednesday in Ruwi and Bahja cinemas.
I watched it yesterday in Dubai....The story sucks.......i advise u to rent it instead of watching it in the movies...!!
5/10
+the ending was.......:angre:
hmmm.. this was a flop in the U.S.. with less than 60 million in the box office!!!
i didnt like the first one.. and am sure that this one is gonna be even worse , still i might end up watching it .. just for a few laughs i guess over how cheesy it is.
Muscati 27-08-03, 10:06 AM Who needs a story when you've got Angelina Jolie in wet tights. I'm there!
MUX I'm not sure your wife is gonna like what you just said!:duh:
Dammit! men's thinking!
Muscati 27-08-03, 02:08 PM Originally posted by SoMe1
MUX I'm not sure your wife is gonna like what you just said!:duh:
Dammit! men's thinking!
Yeh, like you're not looking forward to see her in wet tights yourself ;)
It's got nothing to do with me being a man. That woman is unreal.
Originally posted by mux
Yeh, like you're not looking forward to see her in wet tights yourself ;)
What kind of an insult is that? Do i look like a lesbian?
YUK!
Perfect end to make my day!!
Pffffffffffffffff
Peace out
Part one was crap.....I took a nap in the cienma....I cant imagine how boring part 2 will be. I mean the plot is just too:duh: :duh: :duh: :duh: :duh: :duh: :duh: :lost: :lost: :duh: :duh: :duh: :duh: :bang:
Benz$Babe 28-08-03, 04:35 AM come on i really enjoyed part one ... looking forward to watch part two
i love Angelina Jolie :rolleyes:
Homeless 28-08-03, 04:42 AM I watched it a week back when I was on London
It was alright. I wouldnt say it sucked.
Part one was okay. Wasnt really bad but wasnt so good either but I thought this was was better than the first part.
I wouldnt diss it and I wouldnt shut u off and tell u not to watch it cuz I think its worth watching.
We were about to see Anglena Jolie Life when I was there in london. It was her movie premire and we were all waiting outside but then my friends and I go so tired of waiting and decided to leave! Couldnt wait any longer. We had a long day and we were pretty tired. Had to sit somewhere and grab a bite! We missed her I guess! :lost:
Originally posted by mux
Who needs a story when you've got Angelina Jolie in wet tights. I'm there!
LOL. never thought i'd read such a comment from you.
Blue_Chi 28-08-03, 06:00 AM I saw the first one and I thought that it was not bad at all, compared to all the game-to-movie conversions, the Tomb Raider series is one of the top three.
BaBeLiCiOuS 28-08-03, 06:56 AM Nah the movie isn't that great to watch except if you're an angelina jolie fan !
I was watching Fox news and they say the movie is a waste so there are no future plans for making Tomb Raider part 3 !
haso0on 29-08-03, 01:28 AM bil3aks the movie was amazing
Homeless 29-08-03, 01:49 AM oh well personally I prefered this one from the 1st one!!
i'll wait to see it on DVD :gap:
Homeless 02-09-03, 03:50 PM this is one movie which got different reviews on!!
some say it sux and some say its amazing!
I thought it was ok.
Muscati 07-09-03, 03:24 PM This movie sux even for Angelina Jolie fans. No story, accepted. Horrible special effects, accepted. Horrible direction by has-been A-list director who will probably never be allowed to direct a big budget movie again, accepted. But not a single good shot of Angelina to please the fans? Totaly unacceptable. This is a turd of a movie. But the kind of awful movie that you can sit through and chat with the person you're with without feeling a compulsive need to leave the theatre. I wish I could think of a single good scene in this movie, but I can't. It has no redeeming qualities.
grasshopper 08-09-03, 01:47 PM Utter crap! this film was terrible.
its about 45 mins to long (2hrs 10 mins to long if you are feeling particulaly harsh). Shoot the script writer.. hang the director, do something... Jolie seems perfectly cast to play Lara Croft but finds herself amidst appauling support performances reading woodenly from a script that appears to have been written by a 7 year old. When the film starts with lara dodging obviously foam pillars in a temple that looks as ancient as a a new mcdonalds, closely followed by a mindless moment where lara takes 2 mins to battle a shark just so she can get a lift to the surface from it when she cuold have used that time to swim and not cut herself in the process..you know its time get a bigger box of popcorn pick up your copy of "whats on" and use your phone light to find out what the next release is that might help you forget this pile of total ****e that you have just spent money to come and fall asleep in front of...
-10 out of 10.. stop trying to copy the Indy films!!! its pathetic!
i luved that movie , it's better than part 1
haso0on 11-09-03, 10:09 PM i heard that the movie is banned from chaina
Capricorna 12-09-03, 02:40 AM Not what i expected, but she looked pretty..
|