I've asked so many people about whether or not you would like to see Saddam in power after all what he did in the past and I became confused!

So what do you think..YES or NO for Saddam???

And i would like to know wether you want to see Bush Billy in power after what he has done in Iraq ?!!


regarding Saddam , if he gets away with this war ,,then he deserves to be in power i believe !"

Navigator..I dont wanna see Bush anywhere near Gulf and if it was up to me I'd kick out all their existence in here.

Now..Saddam is couragous person and everyone knows that..the question is did he do enough for his citizens with all the wealth of Iraq..i've heard that an Iraqi citizen would live per month with roughly 30$..do u think that this is fair ???

Now..Saddam is couragous person and everyone knows that..the question is did he do enough for his citizens with all the wealth of Iraq..i've heard that an Iraqi citizen would live per month with roughly 30$..do u think that this is fair ???

No i don't think this is fair .

So do you still think that he should stay ?

Originally posted by KING_OF_ALL
So do you still think that he should stay ?

well ,, as i told u earlier , if he could get away with this war then yeah , he should stay ! but it's quite hard thing !

Let's hope the war will end for the benefit of Islam & Muslimin inshallah;)

I think Saddam should stay because Bush doesn't want
him to stay and they shouldn't do as he wish.

Yes to Saddam. And No to Bush and Blair if extend the poll.

Well i'd say that he shouldn't stay in power.
He haven't shown what is needed to be in power of iraq regarding people of iraq.

Moreover, this has to be dealt with by iraqi people and not by Foreign invaders.

I would like to see saddam in power rather than seeing a foreign military ruler on iraq.

"Well i'd say that he shouldn't stay in power.
He haven't shown what is needed to be in power of iraq regarding people of iraq.

Moreover, this has to be dealt with by iraqi people and not by Foreign invaders.

I would like to see saddam in power rather than seeing a foreign military ruler on iraq."

Well i'd say that he shouldn't stay in power.
He haven't shown what is needed to be in power of iraq regarding people of iraq.

Moreover, this has to be dealt with by iraqi people and not by Foreign invaders.

I would like to see saddam in power rather than seeing a foreign military ruler on iraq."

Very wise, Evilio.

Iraqis have been unable to get rid of Saddam because his regime has such a tight grip. Iraqis should work WITH the US and UK to secure an enlightened Iraqi government after the war, one that puts Iraqis first and not the interests of minority groups such as the Baath Party.

I Think Saddam Should remain In power with the Blessing from Above, as He is the Only Arab leader who knows the really good medicine for Bush and its Toe Blair you need such Tough guys in the Arab world, Fed up with Mr Yes Sir sort of leader

Mephistopheles,
the problem is the UK and USA have other intrest on mind. How would you expect the Iraqis to trust them after they bombed the whole country for one person ..
I say, let Iraqis deal with the situation, if UN did not place sanctioins aginst Iraq .. saddam would never have gone through it!!

"you need such Tough guys in the Arab world"

I agree that you need tough guys, Sleyum. Tough guys such as the rulers of Oman, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, tough guys who put their PEOPLE first, not themselves.

"How would you expect the Iraqis to trust them after they bombed the whole country for one person"

Princess, the US and UK are making their best efforts only to bomb centres of the Iraqi regime, such as Baath party headquarters, army barracks, etc. There have been very, very few instances of bombs going astray.

"let Iraqis deal with the situation"

And so they will. When Saddam is gone.

Originally posted by Arabian Princess
I say, let Iraqis deal with the situation, if UN did not place sanctioins aginst Iraq .. saddam would never have gone through it!!

Now AP
You are really talking politics as politician are like Bananas, for sure after Iran/Iraq war and then Kuwait, if the Americans did not push for sanction that longer and avoiding No fly Zone, Saddam wouldnt have lasted that longer, I can guarantee the Iraq would have Killed him long ago or one of the Army would have overthrown him, The Biggest and Stupidity of the Americans and British keeping the sanction in place and keep killing Iraq over No fly Zone that made Iraq in favour of Saddam and hated Evil American and being seen as the Enemy of their country, the proof are aftre waging the War no one from Basra came up with Flower to greet Evil American as they have expected, Being a Super Power or Economically Power than does not guarantee that you have a sense and Wisdom, and that proved how stupid and Idiot Bush and his gang of criminal are clear like crystal, and all their calculation are going wrong and within no time will be defeated like what has happend in Vietnam.

Originally posted by Mephistopheles
US and UK are making their best efforts only to bomb centres of the Iraqi regime
God how I hate this stuff of "our target is the Iraqi admin.
not the ppl".
We can see that so clearly in T.V.

I say once Saddam has proven his case that he does not have WMD ..he should quit .

Refer to rule 14 of English Sabla.

Rule#14: Religion: The Sabla will not tolerate any disrespect towards Islam and any other religions, nor will it allow any insult towards God or his prophets. The Administration and the moderators have the right to edit or remove any disrespectful post. On the first attempt, a member will get a warning, but if persistent, he or she will get a ban.

Originally posted by Old_Glory
He is "True Muslim". He murders, tortures, and rapes.
:duh: :confused: :duh: :confused:

Yes for Saddam and no for any conqueror

"this has to be dealt with by iraqi people and not by Foreign invaders."
This is the correct answer though I personally do not supporter of this regime.
Saddam has become the beneficiary of Anglo American axis aggression. They have made him the symbol of Iraqi nationalism. It has nothing to do with Islam

Originally posted by Old_Glory
I say he is a "True Muslim". He murders, tortures, and rapes.



No Sir or Madam ?

You are wrong. Religiouswise, this is neither a war of the christians nor arab politicians. This is a war called "Crusade" launched against Iraq for two reasons accompanied by private ambitions.

1st reason:

"Both British and American policy makers link aggression on Iraq with what the Torat stuff claim of the land". Therefore, founders of state of Israel are determined to counter the desert sloths claim for "from Eufrates to the Ocean". Like the current aggression campaign over Iraq, any claim by Zionists in this region of the world is baseless claim intended to propel new world domination.

2nd reason:

Iraq is a renegade nation in view of the joint-British / American policy of predominating the world oil resouces as well as executing the long waited plan of punishing Saddam in particular and Iraq as an economic independent arab nation that led the Arab League in the mid-1970 over oil embargo to the Nations that were regarded as life-urteries of the existance of state of Israel.

If we want to know the reason why American advised by the British have stood up against Iraq. We MUST revisit the short history of the Midle East beginning after 1967 war, between Egyptians and State of Israel. Thereafter, we MUST also track the history of Iraqi nuclear scientists in order to learn the origin of British, American and Israeli conflict with Iraq. So, to be realistic about what is going on in the region, it is not His Excellency the Iraqi President whom the trio are after but the resources that Iraq holds after so many years of planning.

The longer term aim of the Ba'ath Party also is one element which the British and Americans are after. If they succeed in controlling the people of Iraq and then re-arrange the government to run by remote controll then I am afraid the whole of arab world as a unified nation will be a past history. And that is what they will strive to achieve.

To summarise my short note on this subject. I would like to say the sufferings, which have been the result of this process of conflict between Iraqi adminstrations (note administrations) has been basically caused by a policy of distabilization by the trio lot, shall be relieved and people generally shall live like the rest of the population in other arab states in the region but without political will. However state of Israel shall become THE prodominant military power in the region and by that all the regions of the middle east and africa as a whole shall congragate at whatever Israel chose as her Capital for economic dynamism. Ausie could become an equivalent of Israel for the far east and the rest of Asia releaving London and the proposed New Central WTC in NY where London and New York co-ordinates the rest of Europe and Western hemisphere respectively including Israel and Australia. So that is basically what we here at Semma & Muqazzah see as the motive of present conflict in the World. However, according to Profesor Shangob that will not be the end of conflict the one true and devastating conflict would emerge when europe refuse to be controlled by the Yankees as Britain prospers as a result of "laobat 9la hablein" between EU and her relation with Yankees' stake.

Sorry for this lengthy explanation but it is worth reading as it comes from Profesor Shangob's views.