^^3aBaDY^^
19-01-03, 07:23 PM
In the name of Allah, immortal martyr, holy prophet, and everlasting avatar of compassion and mercy. At the present time, this body is unsure as to which direction it should travel: Biological and chemical or nuclear weapons? While all are equally malignant in their own sadistic way, we believe that the threat of chemical weapons alone is the most imminent and dangerous of the three. We speak from personal experience, victimized by these appalling instruments of annhialation during our recente existence as well as witnessing others being innocently mauled by this most horrid of military hardware.
The problem is growing larger and larger by the day. The issue for us has been at the forefront of the political agenda since our unfortunate encounter with Iraq's chemical arsenal in 1984. The Halabja incident in 1988 at the hands of the merciless Iraqis was, for us, enough. The absurd amounts of VX, sarin, and mustard gas coupled with their missing signature on the Chemical Weapons Convention and a lack of action on the UN's part prior to this year is alarming. Our tireless crusade to ban these weapons has resulted in a willing ratification of the CWC in 1997, which reduces and/or eliminates chemical weapons programs throughout the world depending on the nation's situation.
But Iraq's missing signature isn't the only thing that disturbs us: The Israelis haven't even bothered to sign the Convention, and the United States and Russia have yet to suspend their chemical weapons programs.
But despite these issues, there is still hope for world peace pertaining to this subject. What we propose is not all that dissimilar from the United Kingdom's or Russia's plan: A reduction in weapons mirroring the START treaties in the nuclear arena which include halving production and allowing full transparency most immediately in our region.
We believe this will lead to a reduction in atrocities sustained at the hands of these deadly agents. Ultimately, it will lead to a build-up of peace. We emphatically support chemical weapons-reduction and the peaceful implications these measures have. Thank you
The problem is growing larger and larger by the day. The issue for us has been at the forefront of the political agenda since our unfortunate encounter with Iraq's chemical arsenal in 1984. The Halabja incident in 1988 at the hands of the merciless Iraqis was, for us, enough. The absurd amounts of VX, sarin, and mustard gas coupled with their missing signature on the Chemical Weapons Convention and a lack of action on the UN's part prior to this year is alarming. Our tireless crusade to ban these weapons has resulted in a willing ratification of the CWC in 1997, which reduces and/or eliminates chemical weapons programs throughout the world depending on the nation's situation.
But Iraq's missing signature isn't the only thing that disturbs us: The Israelis haven't even bothered to sign the Convention, and the United States and Russia have yet to suspend their chemical weapons programs.
But despite these issues, there is still hope for world peace pertaining to this subject. What we propose is not all that dissimilar from the United Kingdom's or Russia's plan: A reduction in weapons mirroring the START treaties in the nuclear arena which include halving production and allowing full transparency most immediately in our region.
We believe this will lead to a reduction in atrocities sustained at the hands of these deadly agents. Ultimately, it will lead to a build-up of peace. We emphatically support chemical weapons-reduction and the peaceful implications these measures have. Thank you